Predictions and comparison targets
These are proposed numerical expressions, not established physical predictions. Exact arithmetic does not select an observable, units, normalization, or dynamics. A statistical comparison requires independently sourced measurements, scale and scheme conventions, and experimental and theoretical uncertainty. The earlier fixed “falsified if” windows were not a justified uncertainty model and are withdrawn. Rejection of a specified expression does not automatically reject the programme.
| Comparison area | Candidate expression or count | What is still missing |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmological curvature | , the deficit of the proposed density budget. | A cosmological dynamics and sector-specific curvature readout; it is not selected by arithmetic closure alone. |
| Neutrino and quark phases | ; . | Source-selected mixing operators and phase conventions. A ratio of chosen numbers is not a flavor derivation. |
| Proton/electron mass | . | Physical states, a common mass observable, and the fractional correction to the retained approximately 1836.152673 measurement target. The common charging branch is excluded, not repaired by that count. |
| Higgs mass and vev | ; . | A derived Higgs sector and dimensional normalization before assigning GeV units. |
| Electromagnetic and weak coupling | 137 comparison slots; candidate weak fraction . | A charge/field normalization and scale-matched observable. The electromagnetic routing trial fails precision; the cited weak matter-trace derivation fails colour counting. |
| Dark matter and gravity | Candidate density and feedback factor . | A selected dark-sector mechanism and gravitational action. This factor does not by itself predict a variation of or force sterile-neutrino and modified-inertia explanations to be mutually exclusive. |
No new quantitative physical prediction is established by the October 8–10 constructions. Several model branches are positively tested and several are excluded, each within its declared scope.