Boundary-Triad Tate Realization and the Multi-Rees Cartier Bicomplex

Record

Date: 2026-08-14

Status: one proved integral carrier theorem, one proved coefficient theorem, and one sharp loaded blocker. The actual boundary triad of the six-point associahedron derives the complete Tate window and makes the carrier (\mathbb Z/3) obstruction vanish. The filtered multi-Rees Cartier Bockstein supplies the missing conormal-valued (H_0)-to- (\operatorname{Tor}1) direction. These two canonical differentials form a bicomplex; a direct (\lambda{\rm ex}) is only its transferred shadow. The remaining gap is the spatial extraordinary-costalk comparison that identifies this bicomplex with the actual loaded gallery/road complexes.

The actual boundary triad

Let

[ X=K_6,\qquad B=B_{\rm short},\qquad L=F_{14}\sqcup F_{03}\sqcup F_{25}. ]

Here (X) is an oriented three-ball, the three long facets are disjoint closed squares, and

[ \partial X=B\cup L, \qquad B\cap L=\partial L. ]

Thus (B) is a sphere with three open disks removed. The genuine relative (Q=F_2/F_1) carrier is

[ C_*(X,B): \qquad 0\longrightarrow \mathbb Z_{\rm or}\langle[X]\rangle \xrightarrow{N} P_{\rm tag}\langle F_{14},F_{03},F_{25}\rangle \longrightarrow0, ]

with

[ d[X]=F_{14}+F_{03}+F_{25}. ]

This is an actual generic (Q)-leg. Neither term factors through the short boundary complex (F_1).

The filtration connecting morphism is the saturated integral isomorphism

[ \partial_F: H_2(X,B)\xrightarrow{\sim}H_1(B,v_+). ]

Complementary-boundary Poincare–Lefschetz duality gives

[ \operatorname{AD}{(X;B,L)}: H_1(B,v+) \xrightarrow{\sim} \widetilde H_0(L) =\ker(\epsilon:P_{\rm road}\to\mathbb Z). ]

Consequently the middle map is not classified and then inserted. It is the geometric composite

[ \boxed{ m: P_{\rm tag} woheadrightarrow H_2(X,B) \xrightarrow{\partial_F}H_1(B,v_+) \xrightarrow{\operatorname{AD}} \widetilde H_0(L) \hookrightarrow P_{\rm road}. } ]

With the established cyclic facet order and positive normal orientation,

[ m(F_i)=[L_i]-[L_{i+1}], ]

and hence

[ \boxed{m=1-r.} ]

The actual CW triad therefore produces the complete integral resolution

[ \boxed{ 0\longrightarrow\mathbb Z_{\rm or} \xrightarrow N P_{\rm tag} \xrightarrow{1-r}P_{\rm road} \xrightarrow\epsilon\mathbb Z \longrightarrow0. } ]

No rational projector, (1/3), chosen splitting, fitted road coefficient, or new carrier cell occurs.

The carrier obstruction is zero

Let (e_F) be the two-extension of the actual support filtration and let (\beta_\triangle) be the based Tate class. The carrier realization formed from the relative (Q)-complex, the connector (\partial_F), and the complementary-boundary cap product sends

[ \rho_{\rm PL}^{\rm car}(e_F)=\beta_\triangle. ]

Therefore the obstruction left open in entry 114 now vanishes at the integral carrier level:

[ \boxed{ \omega_{\rm car} =\rho_{\rm PL}^{\rm car}(e_F)-\beta_\triangle =0 \in \operatorname{Ext}^2_{\mathbb Z[D_3]} (\mathbb Z,\mathbb Z_{\rm or}) \simeq\mathbb Z/3. } ]

The generic road norm remains

[ q_\Sigma=N_{\rm road}, \qquad \epsilon(q_\Sigma)=3. ]

It is not killed and is not identified with the reflection-odd tag norm.

Equality of the two carrier extensions does not choose a unique equivariant chain homotopy between them. Such coherent identifications form a torsor under

[ \operatorname{Ext}^1_{\mathbb Z[D_3]} (\mathbb Z,\mathbb Z_{\rm or}) \simeq\mathbb Z/2. ]

An explicit equivariant dual-cell diagonal/cap model must select this parity.

The filtered Cartier Bockstein

Entry 114 was also too negative about the coefficient off-diagonal. It is true that the derived Cartier fibre is split after forgetting its filtration, but the filtered multi-Rees packet has a canonical Bockstein.

For one labelled normal, let

[ A_i=\mathbb Z[t_i,x_i,(1+t_ix_i)^{-1}], \qquad P_i=[A_i h_i\xrightarrow{t_ix_i}A_i p_i]. ]

On the (x_i)-Cartier fibre (C_i=A_i/(x_i)),

[ P_i\otimes_{A_i}C_i =[C_i h_i\xrightarrow0C_i p_i]. ]

The first filtered connecting morphism is nevertheless nonzero:

[ \beta_{x_i}([h_i])=t_i[p_i]. ]

After Verdier duality it has the required direction and first Rees symbol

[ \boxed{ \beta_{x_i}^{\vee}:H_0\longrightarrow\operatorname{Tor}1, \qquad \operatorname{gr}{t_i}^1\beta_{x_i}^{\vee} =[t_i]\epsilon_i. } ]

The conormal factor ([t_i]) is part of the canonical symbol. Removing it requires an oriented Gysin evaluation; simply writing (\epsilon_i) would silently trivialize the Rees normal.

For the independent three-normal multi-Rees graph

[ q_i-1=t_ix_i, \qquad i\in{1,3,5}, ]

the central derived fibre is the exterior packet of ranks

[ (1,3,3,1). ]

On its Verdier dual the mixed operator is

[ \boxed{ b^\vee =\sum_{i\in{1,3,5}}[t_i]\epsilon_i\wedge(-), \qquad (b^\vee)^2=0. } ]

It is (D_3)-equivariant; reflection is carried by the determinant orientation. No (x_i), (u_i), (t_i), or integer is inverted.

The correct object is a bicomplex

Let

[ C_{\rm PL}^{\rm Tate}

[\mathbb Z_{\rm or}\xrightarrow N P_{\rm tag} \xrightarrow{1-r}P_{\rm road}\xrightarrow\epsilon\mathbb Z] ]

be the boundary-triad complex, and let (\Lambda^\bullet N_{\rm Cart}^{\vee}) denote the three-normal Cartier exterior packet. The canonical coefficient/carrier object is

[ \boxed{ \mathcal T_+^{\rm mR} =\operatorname{Tot} \left( C_{\rm PL}^{\rm Tate} \otimes \Lambda^\bullet N_{\rm Cart}^{\vee} \right), \qquad d_{\mathcal T} =d_{\rm PL}+(-1)^{p}b^\vee. } ]

The oriented normalization/conductor differential supplies (N,1-r,\epsilon) in every Cartier degree. The filtered Bockstein supplies the vertical direction. Equivariance gives commutation before totalization, and the Koszul sign gives

[ d_{\mathcal T}^2=0. ]

Thus a direct arrow

[ \lambda_{\rm ex}:P_{H_0}\dashrightarrow P_{\operatorname{Tor}_1} ]

is not primitive data. It is a transferred or collapsed shadow of this bicomplex. Keeping the bicomplex avoids both a fitted (1-r) and a fitted Cartier extension.

The remaining loaded obstruction

The bicomplex above is canonical at the product of two established levels: the actual integral PL carrier and the regular multi-Rees coefficient packet. It is not yet an occurrence-resolved PC correspondence.

Indeed,

[ V(t_1x_1,t_3x_3,t_5x_5) ]

has eight irreducible coordinate components. The positive scalar branch (V(x_1,x_3,x_5)) is only one of them. A relative-support or nearby-cycle functor must select that branch while retaining the three ([t_i]) normal lines. It must then identify:

  • the triple stratum with the actual loaded (F_0) packet;
  • the three pair strata with the three whole Cartier galleries;
  • the PL road components with the actual reciprocal/Borel–Moore (\operatorname{Tor}_1) costalks;
  • the resulting map with the mixed block (dH_\Sigma=q_\Sigma-\sum_i x_i\widetilde\xi_i) and the Yoneda cone roof.

The first nontrivial column is now completely specified. For (D03), a valid marked extraordinary-costalk map must derive

[ \boxed{ -[n_{03}] \longmapsto t_3, } ]

where both adjacent-road terms arise from actual generizations and the associated-grade costalk agrees with the established positive whole-gallery normalization. Naming the two terms or inserting the column of (1-r) is not a construction.

Consequently:

  • (\omega_{\rm car}=0) is proved, but a loaded (\omega^{!,\rm PC}) is not yet typed;
  • the filtered coefficient off-diagonal exists, but its spatial extraordinary pull–push does not;
  • the residual (\mathbb Z/2) parity can be tested only after that loaded comparison exists;
  • no negative-sheet assembly, physical-Cut theorem, full (G_{03}^{\rm Cousin}), or CHY identification follows yet.

Evidence

New exact certificate:

  • research/voevodsky/check_multirees_cartier_pl_cap.rs, SHA-256 3389c61357f1ac14503569dac448a15ac89efc294e8ec20e42d9ba118ba5db5e.

The checker verifies the boundary-triad matrices and homology, the saturated Poincare–Lefschetz middle map (1-r), the exact Tate window, (\omega_{\rm car}=0), the (\mathbb Z/2) parity group, the one- and three-normal Cartier Bocksteins, ((b^\vee)^2=0), (D_3) covariance, the totalization signs, and the eight-component support warning. It explicitly does not construct the spatial PC comparison.

Reproduce with rustfmt --check, rustc --edition 2021 -D warnings -O, execution of the certificate, JSON parsing, and git diff --check.

Outcome contract

{
  "claim": "The actual boundary triad (K6; B_short, three long facets) canonically realizes the integral N/(1-r)/epsilon Tate window and makes the carrier Yoneda obstruction zero. Independently, the filtered multi-Rees Cartier Bockstein canonically supplies the conormal-valued H0-to-Tor1 direction. Their correct joint object is a bicomplex, not an inserted direct off-diagonal.",
  "status": "conditional",
  "assumptions": [
    "Carrier orientations and D3 labels are those fixed in entries 103 and 112.",
    "The multi-Rees parameters remain independent and their conormal lines are retained.",
    "The theorem is not promoted to the loaded PC category without an explicit relative-support extraordinary correspondence."
  ],
  "evidence_refs": [
    "research/voevodsky/check_multirees_cartier_pl_cap.rs",
    "ledger entries 100, 103-105, 112-114"
  ],
  "factorization_test": {
    "actual_Q_leg": "proved at carrier level",
    "PL_middle_map": "proved equal to 1-r",
    "omega_carrier": "zero in Z/3",
    "parity_torsor": "Z/2, unselected",
    "Cartier_Bockstein": "proved with first symbol [t_i] epsilon_i",
    "bicomplex_d_squared": "zero",
    "support_components": "eight; the positive x-side requires extraordinary selection",
    "D03_loaded_column": "unconstructed",
    "full_G03_Cousin": "unconstructed"
  },
  "counterevidence": [
    "Forgetting the filtration leaves split Cartier packets with zero direct differential.",
    "The carrier cap does not identify the actual gallery Tor1 lines with PL road cells.",
    "The multi-Rees graph alone does not select the positive support component or provide the Q/Yoneda pull-push."
  ],
  "next_experiment": "Construct the positive relative-support multi-DNC exit correspondence and prove the D03 column -[n03] -> [t3](-tau_q0+tau_q2), including reciprocal/BM variance, excess trace, physical normal, H_Sigma, and Yoneda compatibility."
}